Using Timelines

I mentioned in a previous entry that I’m researching a Civil War novel.

Writers face the eternal question, How can I organize the events of my book, especially an ambitious sprawling beast like this one?

One time-honored tool, paper or software, is the timeline.

Now, it’s easy to use index cards, or a vast sheet of paper, for this purpose. 

But the other day, I googled "timeline software" and came up with a number of promising software candidates.

The one I settled on and ordered is Timeline Maker Basic.

It won’t be the only tool I use, but to keep all the battles straight, what the major players (the Lincolns, Freddy Douglass, John W. Booth, Roger Taney, various generals and grunts, the hydrogen balloon guys, Mother Bickerdyke, et al.) were doing when, this one will serve nicely.

Robert Devereaux

Posted in Writing in general | Leave a comment

Bill Hicks

Okay, this guy’s work you must know.

Bill Hicks Live

Check it out.

Here’s the Wikipedia entry, which starts more or less:

Hicks is often compared to Lenny Bruce (although he frequently denied knowing much about Bruce’s life or work) and Sam Kinison (a contemporary and friend). Comedian Richard Pryor figured largely as an inspiration and stand-up idol for Hicks, as did Woody Allen who also served strongly as a very early influence for a pre-teen Hicks. Like Lenny Bruce, Hicks challenged formal and informal forces of censorship, and suggested a disconnect between the values and operations of modern life, particularly in the United States, a country toward which his humor frequently adopted a tone ranging from cynicism to scathing critique. Hicks characterized his own performances as "Chomsky with dick jokes".

And see his "official" website as well.

We miss you, Bill.

A parting quote from the master:

But you know, I saw this movie last year called Basic … Instinct. Okay. Now, Bill’s quick capsule review: Piece of shit. Okay, now … yeah, yeah. End of story, by the way. Don’t get caught up in that fevered hype phoney fucking debate about that piece of shit movie. "Is it too sexist? And what about the movies, are they becoming too …" You’re just confused, you’ve forgotten how to judge correctly. Take a deep breath … look at it again. "Oh, it’s a piece of shit!" Exactly, that’s all it is. Satan squatted, let out a loaf, they put a fucking title on it, put it on a marquee – Satan’s shit, piece of shit, walk away. "But is it too … and what about the lesbian content, they …" You’re getting really baffled here. Piece of shit! Now walk away. That’s all it is, it’s nothing more! Free yourself, folks. If you see it: "Piece of shit!" Say it and walk away. You’re right! You’re right, not those fuckers who want to tell you how to think! You’re fucking right!
And then I come to find out after that film, that all the lesbian sex scenes … let me repeat that. All the lesbian sex scenes … were cut out of that film because the test audience was turned off by them.

Boy, is my thumb not on the pulse of America.

I don’t want to seem like Randy Pan, the Goat Boy, but that was the only reason I went to that piece of shit. If I had been in that test audience, the only one out front protesting that film would have been Michael Douglas, demanding his part be put back in, all right. "I swear I was in that movie. I swear I was!" "Gee, Mike. The movie started. Sharon Stone was eating another woman for an hour and a half. Then the credits rolled. I don’t remember seeing your scrawny ass, Mike." "Was Bill Hicks in that test audience?"

Robert Devereaux

Posted in Simple Pleasures | 3 Comments

Great DVD course in Russian lit

I’m four lectures into a 36-lecture course on Classics in Russian Literature taught by that lively octogenarian Irwin Weil, a professor emeritus from Northwestern University, and I’m having a ball!

Dr. Weil once said:

Just because something is imaginary, doesn’t mean that it is inferior. If you have no imagination, you are effectively dead.

I love that quote, and now you do too.

This engaging and engaged lecturer is an absolute gem, full of knowledge, spontaneous, full of story, fluent in Russian, and completely and obviouslly in love with his subject matter.  What a find for The Teaching Company!

And it only helps me anticipate even more the War and Peace to come from the translators Pevear and Volokhonsky next fall.

As of this writing, Dr. Weil’s course is on sale. 

Get it!

Robert Devereaux

Posted in Writing in general | Leave a comment

Rumsfeld’s War Crimes

I commend to your attention Donald Rumsfeld: The War Crimes Case.

A few paragraphs:

Donald Rumsfeld was one of the primary architects of the Iraq war. On September 15, 2001, in a meeting at Camp David, Rumsfeld suggested an attack on Iraq because he was deeply worried about the availability of "good targets in Afghanistan." Former Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill reported that Rumsfeld articulated his hope to "dissuade" other nations from "asymmetrical challenges" to U.S. power. Rumsfeld’s support for a preemptive attack on Iraq "matched with plans for how the world’s second largest oil reserve might be divided among the world’s contractors made for an irresistible combination," Ron Suskind wrote after interviewing O’Neill.

Rumsfeld defensively sought to decouple oil access from regime change in Iraq when he appeared on CBS News on November 15, 2002. In a Macbeth moment, Rumsfeld proclaimed the United States’ beef with Iraq has "nothing to do with oil, literally nothing to do with oil." The Secretary doth protest too much.

Prosecuting a war of aggression isn’t Rumsfeld’s only crime. He also participated in the highest levels of decision-making that allowed the extrajudicial execution of several people. Willful killing is a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions, which constitutes a war crime. In his book, Chain of Command: The Road from 9/11 to Abu Ghraib, Seymour Hersh described the "unacknowledged" special-access program (SAP) established by a top-secret order Bush signed in late 2001 or early 2002. It authorized the Defense Department to set up a clandestine team of Special Forces operatives to defy international law and snatch, or assassinate, anyone considered a "high-value" Al Qaeda operative, anywhere in the world. Rumsfeld expanded SAP into Iraq in August 2003.

But Rumsfeld’s crimes don’t end there. He sanctioned the use of torture and cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment, which are grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions, and thus constitute war crimes. Rumsfeld approved interrogation techniques that included the use of dogs, removal of clothing, hooding, stress positions, isolation for up to 30 days, 20-hour interrogations, and deprivation of light and auditory stimuli. According to Seymour Hersh, Rumsfeld sanctioned the use of physical coercion and sexual humiliation to extract information from prisoners. Rumsfeld also authorized waterboarding, where the interrogator induces the sensation of imminent death by drowning. Waterboarding is widely considered a form of torture.

This monster must be brought to justice.

Robert Devereaux

Posted in U.S. politics | Leave a comment

Unchain my heart!

I have a confession to make.

The enabling of that fucker Bush and the whole criminal crew has, for six years, put a crimp in my writing–or, rather, my lack of writing.

Astounding, my love for this country when it’s living up to its ideals.

To see it brought so low by fearmongers and war criminals, to watch as the corporate media lied for them, by omission and commission, these witnessings broke my heart.  Made me wonder of what use fiction writing could possibly be.  It must have been thus for many German artists beginning in 1933.

Ah but now, to have witnessed such a miracle–there can be no other word for it–as we have all witnessed this week, to feel a new surge of hope and wonder–this, my friends, this gets my creative juices flowing once more.

In the time immediately ahead, we are going to see a new freeing in the culture as well. 

And a regained respect throughout the world as we hold our unworthy faux-leaders accountable for their misdeeds, and bring forth worthy leaders from the ranks of Democrats and reformed, chastized, freed-from-their-recent-embrace-of-right-wing-insanity Republicans.

I’m so looking forward to being a part of it!

Robert Devereaux

Posted in Fiction writing | Leave a comment

The people reclaim ALL of Congress!

One more political entry before turning to other matters.

I said yesterday morning, and Randi Rhodes agreed on the radio, that the voters of this nation have risen up just in time and saved it from fascism.

Here’s a great blog entry on that subject by Richard Power.

Yes, yesterday, the majority of voters in the USA thwarted the solidification of the corporatist (i.e., fascist) takeover we have been struggling against since 2000 — at least temporarily.

The new Congress must be sworn in, and that won’t happen until January 2007. The interim will be a dangerous time for all of us. But the Bush-Cheney regime has been severely weakened. Its psychological hold has been broken. Its enablers in the political establishment and the mainstream news media must ponder their futures….

I commend Power’s words to your attention.

What a fantastic dream this is to wake to, the verdict that Webb has won the Virginia Senate seat and that therefore the war criminal Cheney cannot stymie us in critical votes.

You couldn’t make this series of events up in a novel and expect agents, editors, or the reading public to buy it!

Once we have basked sufficiently in this new reality, in the momentary salvation of our nation and the beginning of its long road back to the respect of nations, we’ll need to do these things:

  • Ponder how it is that, while the folks at Democratic Underground saw clearly this threat from the very beginning, it took the American people as a whole so long, and so many impeachable offenses, to wake the fuck up.
  • Figure out how to honor those people, and listen to them when the next assault comes.
  • Devise our own Truth and Reconciliation commission, while holding Bush and his henchmen responsible in our courts and in the realm of international law.
  • Figure out how to roll back every damned, damaging law that this maladministration, aided by its enablers everywhere, has foisted upon us.
  • Put progressive teeth into the Democratic bite. No more spineless kowtowing to fascist bullies.
  • Figure out how to reclaim the media from the corporate right.

All of these things can and must be done!

Robert Devereaux

Posted in U.S. politics | Leave a comment

Stepping back from the brink of fascism

The party of sanity and compassion handily won the House of Representatives, making Bush way lame, as lame as his brain.

Here’s a nice post from Democratic Underground:

America stood up and demanded the accountability that has been lacking for so long. She has said that she won’t become a de facto dictatorship, that she won’t tolerate not having oversight for long, that the corruption builds up but eventually gets drained and that she’s tired of being run by the lobbyists and not the people.

To my friends who call themselves "conservative" – I’m not going to rub it in or gloat – in spite of some of the names I’ve been called and how my thoughts were questioned as traitorous over the past six years – I’ll simply say this – THIS is what a mandate looks like! 15-30% spreads in the votes, not a measly ½ % – it’s an absolute rejection of the direction that your hijacked party has led us in, now that you know for sure Americans are rejecting it – clean up your party, send the religious nuts who want to create a theocracy out of the US packing, send the crooked politicians and lobbyists home and come back to the table with real ideas on creating smaller government, less intrusion into my bedroom, not building other nations while we’re neglecting our own at home here (I’m all for that too, as I’ve said many, many times before – we’re not so far apart as those in DC want us to think so that we don’t pay more attention to the crooked games they play).

Very nicely put.

Two regrets: 

Lamont lost to Lieberman, yes still that Bush-enabler is a Dem and may yet see the light.

And it appears that Angie Paccione, no thanks to a Libertarian spoiler, is headed for a 46% to 43% loss to the disgusting Marilyn Musgrave.  If that happens, I predict that Angie trounces the bigot in two years’ time.  But meanwhile, what a dreadful loss of amazing talent.  Angie has it in her to be President some day.

Robert Devereaux

Posted in U.S. politics | Leave a comment

Vote Democratic!

Not a lot to say today except, my fellow Americans, vote as if your freedoms and the national honor depended on it (for they do), vote Democratic, vote the faux-Republican scoundrels out, and let’s have a decent USA once more.

When we’ve routed the fearmongers, it’s on to pressing issues of the day.

We’ll let the Lame Duck quack his blithering head off, as we look forward to seeing all of these war criminals sweating bullets in The Hague.

Robert Devereaux

Posted in U.S. politics | Leave a comment

Getting around saintly Abe

I think I’ve mentioned I’m mulling a Civil War novel, so it’ll come as no surprise that I need to know about Lincoln.

As a proponent of non-violence and one pretty deeply cynical about politicians the higher up the food chain they’ve risen, I have to come to terms with every player on the national scene whose actions led to the deaths of so many young boys, and that includes Honest Abe.

A People’s History of the Civil War has been helpful so far.

I’m also considering buying The Real Lincoln, though I have a feeling I wouldn’t agree about much politically with the author, and the book is being (has been) slammed for shoddy research and misrepresentation, selective quotations, that kind of thing.

Still, as fiction writers, we get to put together composites of folks out of the oddest bits of string and batting. 

Lincoln was a complex Joe, so why not, yes, give him the saintly side, but also give him a good slam of the obverse perspective?

Robert Devereaux

Posted in My writing and works | Leave a comment

Why do we write?

Susie Bright excerpts this chapter from her book about writing erotica.

Her opener:

If you write an erotic story — or any story, for that matter — and never publish it, you will have done a very good thing. If it stays in a box for you to cherish, if it is passed between you and your lover, shared among friends, or circulated on a private e-mail list, you will have accomplished something quite wonderful.

That’s the heart of it really, the heart of the question, Why write?

Why have I been writing blog entries for the past few months?

Because it’s highly pleasurable to spin out words, lightly to sense where they want to go, and to give them their freedom go there, then at times to shape and re-shape them so that the getting-there is even more pleasing, is just right.

You might say, and be half right, that it avoids tackling the longer forms, the short story, the novel.

You might also say, with a similar degree of correctness, that I’m lubing the engine, that this is my free writing, and that, when I latch onto the novel idea that grabs me quite, it’ll be that much easier to write because, hey, here’s my narrative voice, or here’s the easy flow of this or that character’s thoughts.

I have written entire novels, worthy ones, which haven’t interested a publisher.  In fact, a few of them I intend in the fullness of time publish here, chapter by chapter.

But even if I didn’t, the writing of them is the ultimately pleasure.

Robert Devereaux

Posted in Fiction writing | Leave a comment